con artist: lie to victim

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents people
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, word
Weight: 0.57
, crook
Weight: 0.57
, criminal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings salesman
Weight: 0.57
, painter
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.35
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, composer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
lie to victim 1.00
case victim 0.89
crime to victim 0.86
lie to court 0.80
face his accuser 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(criminal, case victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(criminal, crime to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, lie to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(criminal, face his accuser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(criminal, face his accuser)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(criminal, crime to victim)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(criminal, lie to court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(criminal, case victim)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(criminal, case victim)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(criminal, crime to victim)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(criminal, lie to court)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(criminal, face his accuser)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(criminal, case victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(con artist, lie to victim)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(criminal, crime to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(con artist, lie to victim)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, lie to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(con artist, lie to victim)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(criminal, face his accuser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(con artist, lie to victim)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(con artist, lie to victim)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(con artist, lie to victim)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(criminal, case victim)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(criminal, crime to victim)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(criminal, lie to court)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(criminal, face his accuser)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(criminal, case victim)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(criminal, crime to victim)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(criminal, lie to court)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(con artist, lie to victim) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(criminal, face his accuser)