concentration: be important in archery

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.61
Siblings density
Weight: 0.34
, tendency
Weight: 0.34
, hardness
Weight: 0.34
, strength
Weight: 0.34
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in archery 1.00
be important in badminton 0.77
be important in gymnastics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(strength, be important in badminton)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(strength, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(strength, be important in badminton)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(concentration, be important in archery)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(concentration, be important in badminton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(concentration, be important in gymnastics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(concentration, be important in badminton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(concentration, be important in badminton)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(concentration, be important in gymnastics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(concentration, be important in gymnastics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(concentration, be important in badminton)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concentration, be important in gymnastics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concentration, be important in archery)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(concentration, be important in archery)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concentration, be important in archery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(strength, be important in badminton)