concept: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.68
, idea
Weight: 0.68
, tool
Weight: 0.67
, aspect
Weight: 0.62
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.69
, reality
Weight: 0.69
, definition
Weight: 0.68
, immaculate conception
Weight: 0.67
, truth
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
is helpful 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reality, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(definition, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(string theory, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(string theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(string theory, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reality, is useful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reality, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(definition, is useful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(definition, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(concept, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(concept, is helpful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(concept, is helpful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(concept, is helpful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(concept, is helpful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(reality, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(string theory, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(definition, is useful)