concrete: be better than asphalt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than asphalt 1.00
be louder than asphalt 0.92
be better than bricks 0.79
be better than wood 0.78
be hotter than grass 0.78
be stronger than limestone 0.78
have higher heat capacity than sand 0.77
be stronger than limestone alone 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steel, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than wood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(concrete, have higher heat capacity than sand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than wood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone alone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, be better than wood)