concrete: be louder than asphalt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be louder than asphalt 1.00
be better than asphalt 0.92
be hotter than grass 0.80
be hotter than water 0.76
be stronger than limestone 0.76
be better than bricks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(asphalt, be hotter than grass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be hotter than grass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than grass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concrete, be hotter than water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(concrete, be stronger than limestone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than asphalt)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(concrete, be louder than asphalt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be louder than asphalt)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asphalt, be hotter than grass)