concrete: is stronger then mortar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stronger then mortar 1.00
be better than bricks 0.78
is stronger 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(steel, is stronger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(steel, is stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(steel, is stronger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger then mortar)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(concrete, is stronger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(concrete, is stronger)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, be better than bricks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be better than bricks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(concrete, is stronger then mortar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is stronger then mortar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steel, is stronger)