concussion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, head
Weight: 0.61
, trauma
Weight: 0.58
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.37
, hamstring
Weight: 0.36
, whiplash
Weight: 0.36
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.36
, fracture
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is really bad 0.83
has quality worth 0.82
is bad people 0.80
has quality loss 0.79
has quality effects 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fracture, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(concussion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality effects)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(concussion, has quality effects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hamstring, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(concussion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)