condition: were bad in early 1900s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents situation
Weight: 0.66
, obligation
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.72
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.72
, renal failure
Weight: 0.71
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.70
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were bad in early 1900s 1.00
were for japanese-americans 0.83
were difficult in andersonville 0.79
were in hiroshima prior 0.78
were in hiroshima prior to dropping 0.78
be in sqoop 0.77
be in parsenn 0.77
be in nicaragua 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(condition, be in sqoop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(condition, be in sqoop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(condition, be in sqoop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(condition, be in parsenn)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(condition, be in sqoop)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(condition, be in parsenn)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(condition, be in nicaragua)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(condition, be in parsenn)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(condition, be in nicaragua)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(condition, be in nicaragua)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(condition, be in nicaragua)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(condition, be in parsenn)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s)