condo: be at complex

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.64
, space
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, property
Weight: 0.56
Siblings condominium
Weight: 0.38
, townhouse
Weight: 0.37
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.35
, apartment
Weight: 0.35
, duplex
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at complex 1.00
be at and apartment complex 0.87
be at apartment complex 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at complex)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at complex)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at apartment complex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(apartment, be at apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at apartment complex)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(apartment, be at and apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at complex)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(apartment, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at complex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(condo, be at complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(condo, be at complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(condominium, be at complex)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apartment, be at complex)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment complex)