confidence: affect performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, feeling
Weight: 0.63
, experience
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, integrity
Weight: 0.34
, strength
Weight: 0.34
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.34
, pride
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect performance 1.00
affect sports performance 0.90
improve performance 0.89
significantly impact employees ' performance 0.83
affect sport perfomance 0.82
affect sports perfomance 0.82
affect behavior 0.75
affect speed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(confidence, affect performance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(emotion, affect behavior)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(confidence, affect performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(emotion, affect behavior)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(emotion, affect behavior)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(strength, affect sports perfomance)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strength, affect speed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(emotion, affect behavior)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect performance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strength, affect speed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(strength, affect speed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(strength, affect sports perfomance)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(strength, affect sports perfomance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(confidence, affect performance)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(confidence, improve performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(confidence, improve performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(confidence, affect performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(emotion, affect behavior)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(strength, affect speed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strength, affect sports perfomance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(emotion, affect behavior)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(confidence, affect performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)