confidence: be improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, feeling
Weight: 0.63
, experience
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, integrity
Weight: 0.34
, strength
Weight: 0.34
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.34
, pride
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be improved 1.00
improve performance 0.83
be increased 0.80
be enhanced at night 0.79
has quality better 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quality, be increased)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(confidence, be improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(confidence, be improved)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(confidence, be improved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(confidence, be improved)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(confidence, improve performance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(confidence, improve performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(confidence, be improved)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)