confidence: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, feeling
Weight: 0.63
, experience
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, integrity
Weight: 0.34
, strength
Weight: 0.34
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.34
, pride
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality wrong 0.85
is good leadership quality 0.84
has quality system 0.84
is good value 0.81
be considered quality 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pride, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pride, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(enthusiasm, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pride, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pride, be considered quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(strength, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is good value)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(pride, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pride, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pride, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pride, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(strength, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(strength, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(enthusiasm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(enthusiasm, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pride, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pride, has quality wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(integrity, is good leadership quality)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(integrity, is good value)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(integrity, is good value)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pride, be considered quality)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pride, be considered quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(confidence, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, is good quality)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(confidence, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(confidence, is good quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(confidence, is good quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(confidence, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(confidence, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(confidence, is good quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(confidence, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pride, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pride, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(integrity, is good leadership quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pride, be considered quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(integrity, is good value)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pride, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(strength, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(enthusiasm, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(confidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)