confidence: improve performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, feeling
Weight: 0.63
, experience
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, integrity
Weight: 0.34
, strength
Weight: 0.34
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.34
, pride
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve performance 1.00
affect performance 0.89
be improved 0.83
affect sports performance 0.82
has quality better 0.79
significantly impact employees ' performance 0.78
affect sport perfomance 0.76
is good quality 0.76
affect sports perfomance 0.76
enhance memory 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(strength, affect sports perfomance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(confidence, improve performance)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(confidence, improve performance)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(confidence, improve performance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(strength, affect sports perfomance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(strength, affect sports perfomance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(confidence, improve performance)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect performance)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(confidence, affect performance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(confidence, be improved)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(confidence, be improved)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(confidence, be improved)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(confidence, affect performance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(confidence, is good quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(confidence, is good quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(confidence, be improved)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(confidence, is good quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect sports performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect sport perfomance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(confidence, is good quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(confidence, affect sports performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(confidence, improve performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strength, affect sports perfomance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(confidence, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(emotion, significantly impact employees ' performance)