conflict: be bad in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents matter
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings civil war
Weight: 0.79
, korean war
Weight: 0.74
, cold war
Weight: 0.74
, american civil war
Weight: 0.73
, spanish civil war
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in organization 1.00
be important in organization 0.93
arise in organization 0.79
be good in groups 0.78
be good for society 0.76
be in organization impact on productivity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conflict, be important in organization)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(conflict, arise in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(conflict, be good in groups)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(conflict, be good in groups)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(conflict, be good in groups)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(conflict, be in organization impact on productivity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(conflict, arise in organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conflict, arise in organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(conflict, be in organization impact on productivity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(conflict, be good in groups)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conflict, be in organization impact on productivity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(conflict, be important in organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conflict, be important in organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(conflict, arise in organization)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(conflict, be important in organization)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conflict, be in organization impact on productivity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(conflict, be bad in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conflict, be bad in organization)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(conflict, be bad in organization)