congo: is weak state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weak state 1.00
is weak 0.95
be considered weak state 0.95
is poor country 0.77
is poor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(congo, is weak state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(congo, is weak state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(region, is weak)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(region, is weak)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mali, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mali, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zambia, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zambia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(congo, is weak state)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(congo, be considered weak state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(congo, be considered weak state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(congo, be considered weak state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(congo, is weak)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(congo, is poor country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(congo, is poor country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(congo, is weak)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(congo, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(congo, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(congo, is poor country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(congo, is poor)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(congo, is weak state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mali, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mali, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(congo, is weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)