conifer: be in alike two ways

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
, evergreen
Weight: 0.50
, shrub
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings juniper
Weight: 0.74
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.73
, cedar
Weight: 0.70
, pine
Weight: 0.67
, pine tree
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in alike two ways 1.00
be in two ways 0.94
be alike 0.86
have two types 0.81
have two different types 0.80
have two 0.78
need 2 types 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(deciduous tree, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(evergreen, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(species, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(species, be alike)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(evergreen, be alike)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be alike)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(species, be alike)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two types)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, be alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(deciduous tree, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(evergreen, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(species, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pine, be alike)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pine tree, have two types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two types)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pine tree, have two different types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two different types)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(conifer, be in alike two ways)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(conifer, be in two ways)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, be in two ways)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(conifer, be in two ways)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(conifer, be alike)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conifer, be alike)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(conifer, be alike)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in two ways)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(conifer, need 2 types)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be alike)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conifer, need 2 types)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need 2 types)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(conifer, need 2 types)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(evergreen, be alike)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(species, be alike)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pine, be alike)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two types)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two different types)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(evergreen, be alike)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(species, be alike)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conifer, be in alike two ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be alike)