conifer: differ from many other trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
, evergreen
Weight: 0.50
, shrub
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings juniper
Weight: 0.74
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.73
, cedar
Weight: 0.70
, pine
Weight: 0.67
, pine tree
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from many other trees 1.00
differ from other trees 0.98
be different from trees 0.89
be different from coniferous trees 0.82
be important to trees survivle 0.82
differ from flowering plants 0.82
have used for tree ring analysis trees 0.80
differ in amounts 0.80
be different from other species 0.80
trees 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(evergreen, trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(species, be different from other species)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from trees)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(species, be different from other species)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(evergreen, trees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be different from trees)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, be different from other species)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, trees)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from trees)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(evergreen, trees)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(species, be different from other species)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from flowering plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(conifer, differ from flowering plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from flowering plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from flowering plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(evergreen, trees)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(species, be different from other species)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be different from trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(evergreen, trees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be different from trees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be different from coniferous trees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(species, be different from other species)