conifer: need form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
, evergreen
Weight: 0.50
, shrub
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings juniper
Weight: 0.74
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.73
, cedar
Weight: 0.70
, pine
Weight: 0.67
, pine tree
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
need form 1.00
form 0.91
feel need survive 0.79
need 2 types 0.76
need water reproduce 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(species, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, need form)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(species, form)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(species, form)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(species, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(conifer, need form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(conifer, need form)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need 2 types)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need water reproduce)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(conifer, need water reproduce)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(conifer, need 2 types)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(conifer, need water reproduce)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conifer, need 2 types)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(conifer, need water reproduce)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(conifer, need 2 types)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, need form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(species, form)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, need form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(species, form)