conjunction: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.54
, device
Weight: 0.54
, operation
Weight: 0.48
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.30
, electronic device
Weight: 0.30
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.30
, colorimeter
Weight: 0.30
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality system 0.84
has quality resource 0.79
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality resource)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(conjunction, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(conjunction, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(conjunction, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(conjunction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer monitor, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(galvanometer, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(conjunction, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conjunction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(galvanometer, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conjunction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)