connecticut: has state case

Related concepts

Parents	new york Weight: 0.66 , new england Weight: 0.65 , town Weight: 0.63 , massachusetts Weight: 0.59
Siblings	new york city Weight: 0.37 , philadelphia Weight: 0.36 , maryland Weight: 0.36 , washington Weight: 0.36 , las vegas Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state case	1.00
is important case	0.90
has state state	0.83
be called law state	0.77
be called state	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state case)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state case)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state case)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(las vegas, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(las vegas, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(connecticut, has state case)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is important case)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called law state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(connecticut, has state state)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(connecticut, be called state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(connecticut, is important case)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(connecticut, be called law state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(connecticut, is important case)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called law state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(connecticut, be called law state)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(connecticut, is important case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(las vegas, be called state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(connecticut, has state case) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)