connecticut: was found

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, town
Weight: 0.63
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was found 1.00
was named 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(massachusetts, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was found)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new england, was found)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(washington, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(massachusetts, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(maryland, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(maryland, was found)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(washington, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(washington, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(connecticut, was found)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(connecticut, was named)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(connecticut, was named)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was named)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(washington, was named)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maryland, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(connecticut, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)