consciousness: be considered problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, brain
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sentience
Weight: 0.36
, nationalism
Weight: 0.33
, singularity
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.33
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered problem 1.00
be considered hard problem 0.94
has state problem 0.88
is hard problem 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(singularity, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(singularity, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(singularity, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(consciousness, be considered problem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(consciousness, be considered hard problem)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(consciousness, be considered hard problem)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, be considered hard problem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(consciousness, be considered hard problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(consciousness, is hard problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(consciousness, is hard problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, is hard problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(consciousness, is hard problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(consciousness, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(consciousness, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(consciousness, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(consciousness, be considered problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, be considered problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(singularity, has state problem)