conservation: be hard in indonesia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard in indonesia 1.00
is important kim preshoff 0.76
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(conservation, be hard in indonesia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(conservation, be hard in indonesia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ecology, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ecology, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(conservation, be hard in indonesia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(conservation, be hard in indonesia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ecology, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(conservation, be hard in indonesia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)