conservation: be important from perspective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important from perspective 1.00
be important from quality of life perspective 0.95
be important from scientific perspective 0.92
be important from ethical perspective 0.91
be important to gilgamesh 0.76
be important to us 0.76
be important in current environment 0.76
be important to life 0.75
is important gcse 0.75
is important ks3 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from perspective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from perspective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to life)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(conservation, be important from perspective)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from quality of life perspective)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality of life perspective)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from scientific perspective)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from ethical perspective)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(conservation, be important from quality of life perspective)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from quality of life perspective)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from scientific perspective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(conservation, be important from scientific perspective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from scientific perspective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(conservation, be important from ethical perspective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from ethical perspective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from ethical perspective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from perspective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(conservation, be important from perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)