conservation: has physical part zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zone 1.00
zone 0.91
has physical part process 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(strategy, zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, has physical part zone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(strategy, zone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has physical part zone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, zone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(strategy, zone)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(conservation, has physical part zone)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(conservation, has physical part process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(conservation, has physical part process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(conservation, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(strategy, has physical part zone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(strategy, zone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(strategy, zone)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, has physical part zone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(strategy, has physical part zone)