conservation: have important law

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.62 , topic Weight: 0.60 , strategy Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , wildlife Weight: 0.34 , recycling Weight: 0.33 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have important law	1.00
have law	0.96
law of is law	0.94
have important law of physics	0.87
have law of physics	0.82
get around patent laws	0.76
be important to gilgamesh	0.76
be important in criminal cases	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(conservation, have important law)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(conservation, have important law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(concept, be important in criminal cases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(conservation, have important law)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(conservation, have important law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(conservation, have important law)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(conservation, law of is law)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(conservation, law of is law)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(conservation, have law)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(conservation, law of is law)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(conservation, have law)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(conservation, law of is law)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(conservation, have law)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(conservation, have important law of physics)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(conservation, have important law of physics)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law of physics)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(conservation, have law of physics)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(conservation, have important law of physics)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(conservation, have law of physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(conservation, have important law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(concept, be important in criminal cases)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(concept, be important in criminal cases)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(conservation, have important law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)