conservation: is animal

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.62 , topic Weight: 0.60 , strategy Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , wildlife Weight: 0.34 , recycling Weight: 0.33 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is animal	1.00
be for animals	0.89
be for underground animals	0.78
be favourable in human species	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for underground animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(recycling, be for underground animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(recycling, be for underground animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(conservation, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(conservation, is animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(recycling, be for underground animals)