conservation: is biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is biology 1.00
is important biology 0.98
be connected to biology 0.92
be different from areas of biology 0.91
be branch of biology 0.89
be different from other areas of biology 0.88
is science 0.84
be science 0.84
be important to science 0.82
be new science 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be branch of biology)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be connected to biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be connected to biology)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ecology, be connected to biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ecology, be science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ecology, be branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ecology, be branch of biology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(conservation, is biology)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is important biology)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(conservation, is important biology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(conservation, is important biology)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(conservation, is important biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be connected to biology)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ecology, be branch of biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is biology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)