conservation: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
is good idea 0.86
is important anyway 0.83
be bad 0.79
be important for us 0.79
be important to everyone 0.79
do 0.79
be good for environment 0.78
keep kids doing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(program, keep kids doing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strategy, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(strategy, do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(program, keep kids doing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(strategy, do)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(program, keep kids doing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to everyone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is good idea)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(program, keep kids doing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strategy, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, is good idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recycling, is good idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ecology, be important to everyone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to everyone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(conservation, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(conservation, is thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(conservation, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(conservation, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(conservation, do)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(conservation, do)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(conservation, do)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(conservation, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(strategy, do)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(program, keep kids doing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to everyone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(recycling, is good idea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(strategy, do)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(program, keep kids doing)