conservation: is necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessary 1.00
be necessary to life 0.89
be necessary for energy 0.87
be necessary for development 0.86
is needed 0.86
is required 0.84
is essential 0.83
be necessary to human life 0.82
be necessary for sustainable development 0.79
CAN can difficult process 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(concept, is required)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concept, is required)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is essential)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is necessary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(recycling, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(recycling, is necessary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ecology, is required)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(animal husbandry, is essential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is essential)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(recycling, CAN can difficult process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(recycling, CAN can difficult process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(conservation, is necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is needed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is required)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is essential)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is needed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(conservation, is required)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(conservation, is needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(conservation, is required)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(conservation, is needed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(conservation, is required)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(conservation, is essential)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(conservation, is essential)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conservation, is essential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(concept, is required)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is necessary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(recycling, is necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ecology, is required)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is essential)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(concept, is required)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(conservation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)