conservation: require management

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.62 , topic Weight: 0.60 , strategy Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , wildlife Weight: 0.34 , recycling Weight: 0.33 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
require management	1.00
require active management	0.91
be important in management	0.88
is required	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(conservation, require management)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(conservation, require management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(concept, is required)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(concept, is required)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(conservation, require management)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(concept, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(conservation, require management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(ecology, is required) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(ecology, is required)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(conservation, require management)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(conservation, require active management)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require active management)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(conservation, require active management)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(conservation, is required)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(conservation, require active management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(conservation, is required)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(conservation, is required)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(conservation, is required)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(conservation, require management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(concept, is required)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(ecology, is required)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(concept, is required)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(conservation, require management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)