consistency: be considered competitive advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered competitive advantage 1.00
be considered advantage 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(consistency, be considered advantage)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be considered advantage)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(consistency, be considered advantage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(consistency, be considered advantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consistency, be considered competitive advantage)