consistency: be effective teaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective teaching 1.00
be important for effective teaching 0.98
be necessary in effective teaching 0.97
be important for teaching 0.92
be necessary in teaching 0.91
is effective 0.84
be important in effective communication 0.82
be necessary in learning 0.80
be desirable in classroom 0.79
be important in education 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(continuity, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important for teaching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important for effective teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in effective teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in learning)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(discipline, be necessary in effective teaching)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in teaching)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(discipline, be necessary in teaching)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(discipline, be important for effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(discipline, be important for effective teaching)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(discipline, is effective)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(discipline, is effective)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(discipline, be important for teaching)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(discipline, be important for teaching)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in learning)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(discipline, be necessary in learning)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(continuity, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(continuity, be important in education)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(consistency, be effective teaching)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(consistency, be effective teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary in effective teaching)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(discipline, is effective)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary in teaching)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary in learning)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be important for effective teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(continuity, be important in education)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be effective teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(discipline, be important for teaching)