consistency: be important in advertising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in advertising 1.00
be important in marketing 0.84
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in advertising)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in advertising)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(discipline, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(consistency, be important in advertising)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(consistency, be important in marketing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(consistency, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in advertising)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(discipline, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)