consistency: be important in design

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.67 , virtue Weight: 0.64 , attribute Weight: 0.64 , quality Weight: 0.62 , characteristic Weight: 0.61
Siblings	toughness Weight: 0.35 , accuracy Weight: 0.34 , continuity Weight: 0.34 , honesty Weight: 0.34 , discipline Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in design	1.00
be important in web design	0.89
be important in graphic design	0.88
be important in engineering	0.84
be important in project	0.78
be important at work	0.76
is important quality	0.76
be important to intps	0.75
be important in manufacturing	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(quality, be important in project) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in design)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(quality, be important in project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in project)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important at work)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important at work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(quality, be important in project) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in design)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in design)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important to intps)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(discipline, be important at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(discipline, be important at work)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(honesty, is important quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important at work)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(honesty, be important at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(honesty, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in design)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in web design)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in graphic design)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in web design)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in graphic design)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in web design)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in web design)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in graphic design)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(consistency, be important at work)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in graphic design)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(quality, be important in project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(accuracy, be important to intps)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(accuracy, be important at work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(discipline, be important at work)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(honesty, be important at work)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(consistency, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(quality, be important in project)