consistency: be important in marketing

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.67 , virtue Weight: 0.64 , attribute Weight: 0.64 , quality Weight: 0.62 , characteristic Weight: 0.61
Siblings	toughness Weight: 0.35 , accuracy Weight: 0.34 , continuity Weight: 0.34 , honesty Weight: 0.34 , discipline Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in marketing	1.00
be important in advertising	0.84
be important in business	0.80
be important to business	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(quality, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(attribute, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in advertising)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important to business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(quality, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(attribute, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(accuracy, be important in advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in advertising)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(discipline, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(discipline, be important in business)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(honesty, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(honesty, be important to business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(honesty, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in advertising)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(consistency, be important in business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in advertising)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in advertising)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in advertising)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(consistency, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in advertising)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(discipline, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(honesty, be important in business)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(honesty, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(consistency, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)