consistency: be such concern in publishing industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such concern in publishing industry 1.00
be in business important concerns 0.77
be in business important ethical concerns 0.77
be in business important ethical concerns give 0.77
be important in media writing 0.77
be in business ethical concerns 0.77
be in business concerns 0.77
be important in business 0.76
be in business ethical concerns give 0.76
be in business important concerns give 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be in business important ethical concerns give)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(discipline, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(honesty, be in business important ethical concerns give)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(honesty, be in business important ethical concerns give)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in media writing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in media writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(consistency, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honesty, be in business important ethical concerns give)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(discipline, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in media writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(consistency, be such concern in publishing industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)