consistency: developing business documents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
developing business documents 1.00
be important to business 0.75
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consistency, developing business documents)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(discipline, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(discipline, be important in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(honesty, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important to business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(honesty, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(consistency, developing business documents)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(consistency, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consistency, developing business documents)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(discipline, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(consistency, developing business documents)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)