consolidation: be in industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, step
Weight: 0.58
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.33
, expansion
Weight: 0.33
, reduction
Weight: 0.32
, revision
Weight: 0.32
, correction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in industry 1.00
affect market for music industries 0.87
be important in global environment 0.75
affect market 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consolidation, be in industry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consolidation, be in industry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consolidation, be in industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market for music industries)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(consolidation, be in industry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(consolidation, be in industry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(consolidation, be in industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(consolidation, be in industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(consolidation, be in industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(consolidation, be in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)