constellation: be named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celestial object
Weight: 0.69
, program
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, company
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big dipper
Weight: 0.63
, orion
Weight: 0.63
, leo
Weight: 0.60
, andromeda
Weight: 0.57
, hydra
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named 1.00
is named 0.99
were named 0.94
be named in latin 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(big dipper, is named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(big dipper, is named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(big dipper, is named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(constellation, be named)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(constellation, were named)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(constellation, were named)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constellation, were named)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, were named)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(constellation, be named in latin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(constellation, be named in latin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named in latin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, be named in latin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, be named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(big dipper, is named)