constipation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.74
, complication
Weight: 0.67
, illness
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings diarrhea
Weight: 0.37
, nausea
Weight: 0.36
, insomnia
Weight: 0.36
, hypoglycemia
Weight: 0.36
, migraine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
feel bad 0.80
is bad people 0.80
hurt bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(constipation, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(constipation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nausea, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(migraine, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(nausea, feel bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nausea, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nausea, has quality worse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(migraine, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(migraine, has quality worse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(nausea, feel bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(nausea, feel bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(diarrhea, feel good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(constipation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(constipation, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(constipation, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(constipation, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(constipation, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(constipation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diarrhea, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nausea, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nausea, feel bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(migraine, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(constipation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)