construction worker: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
get paid little 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(electrician, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(electrician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(electrician, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(carpenter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid little)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(construction worker, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(construction worker, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(construction worker, get paid little)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid little)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electrician, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)