construction worker: use hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
use hats 1.00
wear hats 0.95
use hard hats 0.95
wear hard hats 0.92
wear backwards hats 0.89
wear backwards hard hats 0.86
wear shirts 0.80
wear helmets 0.79
use helmets 0.78
wear hawaiian shirts 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear hard hats)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(electrician, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear hats)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(electrician, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear hard hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(construction worker, use hats)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(construction worker, use hard hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear backwards hard hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use hard hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hard hats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(construction worker, use hard hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear backwards hard hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear backwards hard hats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear backwards hard hats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use helmets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(construction worker, use helmets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use helmets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(construction worker, use helmets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(construction worker, wear helmets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(construction worker, use hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(electrician, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use hats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electrician, wear hard hats)