construction: is wood pink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, expansion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.73
, excavation
Weight: 0.63
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.58
, completion
Weight: 0.56
, beam
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wood pink 1.00
has color yellow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beam, has color yellow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(beam, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(beam, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(construction, is wood pink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(construction, is wood pink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(construction, is wood pink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(construction, is wood pink)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(beam, has color yellow)