constructivism: be important in international relations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents theory
Weight: 0.69
, approach
Weight: 0.60
, movement
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
Siblings anarchism
Weight: 0.35
, structuralism
Weight: 0.35
, relativity
Weight: 0.34
, formalism
Weight: 0.34
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in international relations 1.00
be important in relations 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in relations)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in international relations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in international relations)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in relations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(theory, be important in relations)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in relations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(constructivism, be important in relations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(constructivism, be important in relations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in relations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(theory, be important in relations)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in international relations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(theory, be important in relations)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(constructivism, be important in international relations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in international relations)