consumer: affect business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect business 1.00
be important to business 0.89
be important to retail business 0.82
affect market environment 0.82
benif from businesses 0.78
benefit from competition among businesses 0.77
benefit from competitive industries 0.76
benefit in market 0.75
benif from businesses having 0.75
benefit from industries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(consumer, affect business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(client, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(client, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(client, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(consumer, affect business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(consumer, affect business)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(consumer, affect business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(consumer, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(consumer, affect business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, be important to business)