consumer: belong to two different food chains

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
belong to two different food chains 1.00
belong to two food chains 0.99
be important in food chain 0.84
depend in food chain 0.82
be at bottom of food chain 0.81
be differentiated in food chain 0.80
be listed after producers in food chain 0.79
want food 0.78
get food 0.77
have different tags on certain subreddits 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(user, have different tags on certain subreddits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(user, have different tags on certain subreddits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(user, have different tags on certain subreddits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, get food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(consumer, get food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(consumer, get food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(consumer, get food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(user, have different tags on certain subreddits)