consumer: benefit from competition

Property	Similarity
benefit from competition	1.00
benefit from competition among businesses	0.92
benefit from bitcoins	0.86
benefit in competitive market	0.86
benefit from competitive industries	0.83
benefit in market	0.82
benefit in highly competitive market	0.81
benefit from trade	0.80
benefit from perfectly competitive industries	0.80
benefit from advertising	0.79

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in competitive market)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in competitive market)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in market)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in competitive market)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from advertising)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in competitive market)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from advertising)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from advertising)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from advertising)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(consumer, benefit from competition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)

Parents	sector Weight: 0.62 , business people Weight: 0.61 , mechanism Weight: 0.60 , client Weight: 0.59
Siblings	user Weight: 0.64 , plaintiff Weight: 0.61 , pet owner Weight: 0.58 , listener Weight: 0.54 , boomer Weight: 0.45

consumer: benefit from competition

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible