consumer: benefit from competition among businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit from competition among businesses 1.00
benefit from competition 0.92
benefit from competitive industries 0.86
benefit in competitive market 0.84
benif from businesses 0.84
benefit from bitcoins 0.83
benefit in market 0.83
benefit from perfectly competitive industries 0.83
benif from businesses having 0.83
benefit from industries 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(consumer, benif from businesses having)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in competitive market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)