consumer: benefit in market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit in market 1.00
benefit in competitive market 0.93
benefit in highly competitive market 0.89
has market 0.86
benefit from bitcoins 0.86
benefit from global trade 0.85
affect market environment 0.85
benefit from trade 0.84
benefit from competitive industries 0.83
benefit from competition among businesses 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in market)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in competitive market)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in highly competitive market)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from competition among businesses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(consumer, benefit from global trade)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit from global trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, benefit in market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(consumer, benefit in market)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(consumer, benefit in market)